Judges: Becky and Sue
University of Dubuque and Clarke University (respectively)
In
the spirit of Don Tillman, the main character in The Rosie Project, who
was always making lists based on his sometimes odd preferences, we
decided to see
how Eleanor & Park stacks up against The Rosie Project using our
favorite criteria for books!
One point for each criteria that is met:
Criteria (Becky
and Sue)
|
||
Witty one line reviews
|
X
|
X
|
Characters go on a trip--preferably a road trip
|
X
|
|
Characters that have pets
|
||
A structural plot device
|
||
Graphs and charts to explain complicated plots
|
||
Provide a musical playlist
|
X
|
|
Last page of the book is an even number
|
X
|
|
Edited by David Levithan
|
||
Author has brown hair
|
X
|
X
|
Characters have pronounable and non-ridiculous names
|
X
|
X
|
An index
|
||
Use footnotes--even in fiction
|
||
Acronyms are used frequently
|
X
|
|
Create intelligent, strong-willed, quick-witted leads
|
X
|
X
|
Weather is part of the plot
|
||
Graphic cover
|
X
|
X
|
One of the sub-characters keeps a diary
|
X
|
|
Snarky best friend/minor character
|
X
|
|
Recipes for the meals they eat in the book
|
If
we tally up the votes, it’s 9-7. But that doesn’t seem right. After
some discussion, we both agree that Eleanor & Park should win this
round. Maybe if we
split it up by reviewer: Becky’s 5-4. Sue’s 4-3 with The Rosie Project
still wins both. I think the lesson we learn here is the same one that
Don does in The Rosie Project, objectivity is a great approach in
science, but maybe not so much in the area of love.
Books are more than just the sum of their component parts. The Rosie Project has lots of the characteristics we were looking for, but Eleanor & Park has that little something we didn’t know we wanted. Or
didn’t know was exactly what we needed.
When finding a wife or picking a book, I think we all agree that you’ve got to let the heart decide. And these hearts pick Eleanor & Park!
No comments:
Post a Comment